I'm about to buy vinyl replacement windows, I'm in Maryland, suggestions on what manufactor.?

I 'm looking at the soft-lite, star heat and Simonton, and any suggestion that they should settle, Sears, Lowes, the nation window, etc.

Visit your local lumber Lowes center and not only sawmill Menards. Having access to a good line of replacement windows and X-ACT Crestline, Peachtree. If you go by Sears, Lowes, you have to pay more. Your local lumber yard can also help with measurements. You can also refer a contractor who buys their materials and it is good in replacing windows. Windows may price and get the price of the installation that carpentry. Any replacement window, if measured correctly can be installed in one hour or less. The large picture window units and second level will be two hours. or less, and to 2 workers. Can not burn if you order from your local lumber yard, if you order a company Franchising window want much money down, and who knows if and when it appears. Windows are a scam, beware of the seller insisting. A good average price is $ 400 per window on the ground floor, and $ 500 for the window to 2, 3 levels. This is the window and work together. Working single-digit $ 100 for the window on the ground floor and $ 200 for the window above. This will give the carpenter a decent profit, but will save lot of dollars from a business franchise window. It is likely that the window of the franchise company to try to make other work such as ceilings, coatings and then we will give a broad measure of financing at an interest of 20%. Beware of scams. Many these companies are really loan sharks posing as contractors of the window. Overburdened by the windows, then set up a payment plan that ends in a funding level of 20% or more. Do not put the money down. Paying for windows on delivery to your home.

M-D Building Products 1610 Steel Door Magnetic Weatherstrip, 36-by-81 Inches, Beige $19.88 For steel entry doors. Saw kerf design. Door set wedges into the kerf to provide a compression weather seal on the hinge side, a magnetic seal on the top and latch side. Includes two 82” lengths, one 36” length….

Ladies Miss Word Processor grammar errors than those

If you've spent some time using email is likely to have received wide dissemination of Limerick which parodies the imperfections and limitations of spell checking software. It begins: "I have a spell checker. / It came with my pea see. / Plane is read Marx four my magazine / Miss steaks March Aye node can. "Although the functions of the spelling integrated applications word processing are effective in the search for simple spelling mistakes are not able to identify words that are spelled correctly but are used incorrectly.
Word processors also features grammar. Curious to know how they perform, we tried a few little help from some of our friends – Tom Nefeldt, Weske Jim and Dave Williams.
Most grammar checkers use a technique called "treatment natural language, which uses a dictionary to identify the parts of speech of each word. The database – in theory – correcting grammar allows "analyze" prayers. The analysis is the process of dissecting a sentence into its constituent parts of speech to discuss the role and syntactical relationship of each part.
The software analyzes the sentences by applying rules of grammar written in the program – to use the verb tense and inflection, adjectives and adverbs, punctuation, subject-verb agreement and other conventions of grammar. Through this process, the program is supposed to determine whether a sentence is grammatically correct. In practice, however, tested applications check grammar errors that dominated much more than what they found. In some cases, suggestions were bad.
For testing, we prepared 40 sentences, each of which contains at least one error of grammar or word usage. Three These sentences contain two errors each, and a sentence contains three errors, for a total of 45 errors. First see how you can find, and you say that the errors software found – and lost.

1. Ohio State Buckeyes, who practice hard.
2. My class is in the mist of this project at this time.
3. President Bush to grant federal assistance for much of Texas after wildfires spread across the state.
4. Ralph has not finished repairing the roof on time, so the rain has damaged the roof of the hall.
5. Bob had hoped to find a job Albuquerque, but took a job in El Paso by the need to cut.
6. The water was rushing through the dam since 3:00 this morning.
7. I apologize for the incontinence, and hope to have the opportunity to speak later.
8. By examining the models of gear to wear is like lubrication problems can be detected.
9. A young man is also a hostile residence.
10. Roger has collected the data, but Alice wrote the report.
11. Sheldon Stephanie and I encouraged to apply for the grant.
12. The responsibilities of management Content includes vacancies online, site development, branding, business development and negotiation of contracts.
13. Pasteurization is that milk is heated to a specific temperature for a certain period of time to kill bacteria.
14. The wrestling team cons pests can disinfect the house on Monday.
15. The reason Robin left work too early because the radiator was broken and the building was cold.
16. It is expected that this measure will serve to offset the tax revenue on sales that were weaker than expected.
17. The bus runs every day except holidays.
18. Stephanie list all submitted its report.
19. For his age, I hope having behavior problems in my class, I am a teacher not their babysitter.
20. Cayenne positive contribution to the flavor of the dish.
21. Dallas / Fort Worth International Airport expects less passengers this Memorial Day.
22. Since Fred retired, scenery and take a nap almost every afternoon.
23. The software update completed our corporate objectives for managing customer relationships.
24. Ellen is the person who answers my question.
25. The dog eats dog food attached.
26. Gordon is already sweeping the warehouse.
27. Have you ever considered sending the package?
28. The company has begun the process of renovating the visitors' lobby and rooms conference.
29. The main cause of the fire was the improper storage of cleaning solvents near a panel power switch.
30. This fiscal year, nearly Penny reduce the cost of their travel department in half, and absenteeism is five times lower than it was two years ago.
31. The Company CEO has formed an advisory board six members to create positive incentives to increase employee loyalty.
32. Providence is one of the few cities in the U.S. a ban on overnight parking.
33. "Do you dilute the thought of that discharged its responsibility" Phil said Brian anger.
34. The President has appointed Frank and me to be part of the disciplinary review committee.
35. Carefully following the steps This recipe, roast pork loin is permanent and wet.
36. Phyllis has just taken a meal break of 15 minutes on Monday.
37. Mary Carol hereby meet at 4:15, but he missed the appointment because he had forgotten his watch.
38. It is disturbing that the Board of Public Works has prepared it.
39. The farmers first started using the insecticide in 1982.
40. The reason why Karen had resigned lost due respect for their supervisor.

Our examples of sentences containing 18 types of errors:

• Redundancy Sentences 1 (the pronoun "them" and the comma should be deleted before), 6 ("Hello" and "h" are redundant), 20 ("positive" is redundant with the verb "help"), 29 ("close" is redundant with the "proximity"), 31 ("positive" is redundant with "Incentives") and 39 ("originally" is redundant with the verb "began")
• Homophone ERRORS: two sentences ("fog" should be "average"), 5 ("cut" must be "pure"), 9 ("hostile" must be "Hostel") and 29 (the name "Principle" should be the word "principal"), 31 ("attorney" should be "Board") and 33 (the "dilution" should be "illusions")
• FRAGMENT SENTENCE: Sentenced to 3 (no full verb)
• INTRODUCTION INCORRECT RESTRICTIVE PHRASE: Phrase 3 ("who" should be "As")
• Run-on sentence: four sentences (the comma after "time" should be a semicolon) and 19 (must be "… in my class, I am your master, and not his nurse)
• FALSE the Word: July sentences ("incontinence" should be "mind") 14 (the adverb "Maybe" should be the verb "may"), 21 ("less" should be "less", the adjective used with proper names in plural, count), 25 (the word "map" should be the phrase "a lot") and 32 ("only" should be "little")
• DEFECTIVE Sermon: sentences 8 (the preposition "by examining traces of wear on the gear" can not operate as a topic sentence) 13 (should start "Pasteurization is a process of heating milk"), 15 (must be "Robin quit her job at first because the water heater was broken "or" The reason Robin left her job is too soon that the heating was broken ") and 40 (the expression" the reason was "a request" that "termination clause)
• Punctuation mistakes: 10 sentences (missing comma before "but" conjunction in this complex sentence) and 19 (a comma is missing before the adversarial element "not a baby-sitter)
• Pronoun Use Incorrect: 11 sentences ("I" should be "me"), 24 (pronoun subjective case "that" must be the nominative pronoun "WHO") and 34 ("I" should be "I")
• Subject-Verb Disagreement: Sentencing 12 ("includes" should "include")
• Passive Voice: Sentence 16 (requires appropriate field, for example, "The mayor hopes that …")
• Adjective, adverb SWAP: 17 sentences (the adjective "Daily" should be the word "every day"), 18 (the word "ready" should be the adverb "now"), 26 (the word "and" should be the word "ready") and 27 (the adverb "always" should be the combination adjective-noun "all roads")
• Suspension of sentences prepositional 19 (must be "at your age you should be able control their behavior …"); and 35 (should start "If you follow the steps …")
• WRONG VERB: 22 sentences ("establishes" should be "lies") and 23 (meeting "should be" snap ")
• FALSE verbal inflection: 28 ("starters" should be "Started")
• Offsides MODIFIER: 30 sentences (the word "almost" must immediately precede the "middle") and 36 ("only" must appear immediately after "a 15 minute break" or before "Monday" as the emphasis intentional)
• Pronoun VAGUE REFERENCE: Sentencing at 37 (he missed his appointment is unclear)
• history ambiguous determination of sentence 38 (pronoun vague in this passive construction requires clarification about who is disturbed – for example, "Lou discovers the intentions of the Committee Disturb)

Although the grammar of most word processing applications can help people draw attention to the problem sentences, which are not always right or appropriate correct solution. In our test, the grammar checker with better results found fewer than half errors in our example sentences. What word processing grammar found – and lost

Microsoft Word for Macintosh 2004 and 2008 correctly identified eight of the 45 errors (18 per cent of them), with sentences 4, 11, 12, 13, 16, 22, 28 and 40). Have received incorrect advice or misleading in eight cases: it is proposed revision of the sentence 8, but for the wrong reasons – calling for a passive construction instead of identifying the problem as preaching defective in sentence 3, which suggests replacing the appropriate preposition "a" with the adverb "also" in sentence 14, which was interpreted as a sentence fragment, and 21, which proposes to change the "w" in "Fort Worth" in lowercase 23, in which the error was lost and misnamed suggested changing the relationship "with the possessive form" of the relationship, in the case 27, which was lost "all" forms, but suggested replacing "to submit" to "transfer" – which changes the intended meaning of the sentence to 33 years, which has been lost "dilute" the error, but the suggestion has been no significant change for the "no" to "no", and 38, which led to the ambiguous history, but suggested replacing "shall" to "is").

Microsoft Word 2007 for Windows has found 11 errors (24 per cent of them) in sentences 3, 4, 9, 11, 12, 17, 22, 23, 28 and 31. If it is true found "less / fewer problem" in the sentence 21, ill-advised use of a lowercase "W" in "Fort Worth." He also gave incorrect advice in the case 27, which was lost "all forms" but suggested to replace " ship "for" transfer "- which changes the intended meaning of the sentence.

WordPerfect Office X4 does the best job, but correctly identified 21 errors (48 percent) in Case 8, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 24, 26, 28, 31, 32, 34 and 40. As correctly identified errors in sentences 3 and 29. He identified the problem earlier period and the comma is missing before the contradictory "and not" in prayer 19, but forgets dangling prepositional phrase, and in 23 successfully recommended a change in "complement" to "complete", but evil has suggested changing "Client" in the possessive form in the client. He incorrect or misleading in eight other cases in prayer five understood the idiom "of …" recommended changing needs and improperly "cut" to "break" in June, missed the "h" / "Tomorrow" for dismissal, however, made the suggestion to change without consequence "3 am" to "3:00 am" by a sentence of nine years, he has proposed moving "hostile" before the youth (and changing the intended meaning), and the change of "residence" to "house" or "house" but he suggested revision of the sentence of 13 years, but for the wrong reasons – calling for a passive construction instead of identifying the problem that the preaching 14 defect misinterpreted as a fragment of the sentence, 25, who has missed the problem with "award" and not challenge the use of the verb "eat" in 33, missed the "dilute" the problem while proposing the replacement of the contraction of "no" – a superficial change, and 38 are proposed for replace "is" by "is" or "you."

All inspectors have gone overlooked grammatical errors or incorrect suggestions offered in 17 sentences: 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 10, 14, 20, 25, 27, 30, 33, 35, 36, 37, 38 and 39.
The capacity control software to operate the grammar even at a rudimentary level is remarkable, because English is pockmarked with numerous exceptions to the rules and idioms that challenge, literal translation and its own syntax, distinct. Request a software to analyze the English language with all its peculiarities, and correct errors in usage, is a reasonable request.
Using software grammar checkers with discretion, so. Grammatically edition, is a function in which human beings computers still much better.

About the Author

Jeff March and Marti Childs are co-owners of EditPros LLC, an editorial services company that performs writing, editing and proofreading for businesses, educational institutions, research organizations, government agencies, and trade and professional organizations. EditPros, of Davis, Calif., was established in 1993. Marti and Jeff also teach writing and editing seminars, and are co-authors of a book titled “Echoes of the Sixties” (1999, Billboard Books, New York; ISBN: 0-8230-8316-0).

The Consolidated Vultee B-24 Liberator

As the olive-green jeep drove round the quad-engined Consolidated Vultee B-24 Liberator, the morning, sun, unobstructed by the flawlessly blue sky, glinted off the sides of aircraft 252534 “Witchcraft” and the Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress 231909 “Nine-o-Nine” on that early September 2005 day at Farmingdale’s Republic Airport on Long Island

About to sample a flight aboard this B-24 aerial bomber, I somehow felt as if I had entered a World War II time warp.

The Consolidated Vultee B-24 Liberator had had its origins in the 1938 US Army Air Corps requirement for a long-range, high-capacity bomber able to cruise at 300 mph and 30,000 feet, with a 3,000-mile range.  Although it had initially been envisioned that Consolidated Aircraft would produce existing B-17s, it had been able to design an entirely new long-range, four-engined, heavy bomber in virtually the same time that it would have taken for it to convert its current San Diego production line, building an initial mock-up in January of 1939, three months before the contract between Consolidated and the Army Air Corps had been signed on March 30.  The prototype, designated XB-24, first flew by the end of the year, on December 29, with full-scale production commencing the following autumn for the United States, British, and French governments.

The design, as reflected by the dark green-livery aircraft with a red-and-white diagonal stripe before me, had featured an aluminum alloy monocoque structure built up of five main bulkheads and covered with stressed Alclad skin of 67.2 feet length with a glazed nose turret, a raised cockpit windscreen, a top turret, ventral bomb bay doors which retracted to form the fuselage underside, two rectangular waist-gunner apertures, and the glazed tail turret.  Sporting two high-mounted, cantilever wings, whose planform had been based on that of the Model 31 flying boat, it utilized a high aspect ratio Davis airfoil of all-metal construction, consisting of the center and two outer sections with detachable wing tips, and continual taper from their fuselage mating points to their tips.  The increased spacing between the front and rear spars permitted additional fuel tankage and hence range.  The outboard, metal-framed ailerons were fabric-covered, while hydraulically-actuated, area-increasing, trailing edge Fowler flaps, warped to conform to the wing underside planform taper, stretched between the ailerons and the fuselage root and replaced the less effective split flaps of the comparable B-17.  At 110 feet, the wings offered a total area of 1,048 square feet.

Four PBY engine packages housed 1,200-horsepower Pratt and Whitney two-speed, super-charged R-1830-33 pistons with three-bladed, Hydromatic, full-feathering Hamilton Standard propellers.

The all-metal horizontal stabilizers, sporting twin vertical tails with fabric-covered, metal leading edge rudders, equally featured fabric-covered elevators and offered a radical departure from the conventional, single-tail of the Flying Fortress.

The tricycle undercarriage, replacing the less stable bicycle arrangement of the B-17, featured a rearward-retracting single nose wheel storable in the fuselage-integral, door-enclosed wheel well and the two single, lateral- and outward-retracting main wheels which were housed in uncovered wing-underside fairings between the in- and outboard engines.  All had been mounted to oleo struts and had been actuated by hydraulic jacks.

The aircraft, of 60,000 pounds gross weight, could attain a maximum speed of 297 mph at 25,000 feet and fly 1,540-mile sorties with normal fuel and its maximum bomb load at a 237-mph average speed.

The first B-24 version, powered by the R-1830-33 engines and entailing a production run of only 26, had been built in San Diego and flown to the United Kingdom for operation by the British government, but initial experience had indicated that they had been unsuitable for their intended European combat missions and they had therefore been forcibly converted to transports, without armor, for use on the Trans-Atlantic Return Ferry Service.

The Liberator’s development, although initially protracted, ultimately led to the B-24A, which had featured four 20 m/m cannons in below-forward fuselage fairings, two .303-inch waist guns, one .303-inch tunnel gun, and two .303-inch tail guns, and had entered service with the Royal Air Force Coastal Command.

The LB-30, built entirely to British specifications, had been powered by four two-speed supercharged R-1830-S3C4G engines with Curtiss Electric full-feathering air screws.

The XB-24B had sported turbo-supercharged piston engines with self-sealing tanks and armor.

The B-24C, the succeeding version powered by R-1830-41 engines with exhaust-driven turbo-superchargers, had featured power-driven dorsal and tail turrets, each with .50-caliber guns.

The subsequent derivative, the B-24D, offered ultimate armament capability, with ten .50-caliber guns, of which two additional ones had been installed in the nose and one additional one had been installed in the tunnel.  Powered by R-1830-43 engines, the more capable version contained auxiliary self-sealing fuel tank cells in the outer wings, thus increasing overall fuel capacity and aircraft range, with further tankage installation capability in the bomb bays.  The B-24D could carry two 4,000-pound bombs, each attached to a rack under either wing.

Several other derivatives, differing in armament provision, anit-icing capability, and production method, followed.

Although the Liberator had fought in many theaters during the outbreak of WWII, among them England, the Middle East, and the Aleutians, by 1943 it had entirely replaced the Flying Fortress in the Pacific.

Seeking to rectify many of the design deficiencies associated with its dual-tail configuration, Consolidated Vultee had produced an experimental, single-fin version designated the XB-24K, whose tail components had been comprised of the stub attachment assembly, the dorsal fin, the horizontal stabilizers and their elevator surfaces, the vertical tail itself, its trim-tabbed rudder, and the tail turret fairing.  The larger, increased-area tail improved the aircraft’s lateral stability and its larger rudder had proven more effective during dual-engine-out conditions on a single side.  Re-designated the B-24N, the R-1830-75-powered derivative featured a streamlined Emerson Model 128 spherical nose turret, which vastly increased bombardier and navigator visibility, improving target aim and firing accuracy.  The turret’s reduced drag profile, coupled with that of the singular, although much larger vertical fin, increased the aircraft’s range capability with a 5,000-pound payload at maximum power settings by 300 miles.  A revised canopy, which reduced the number of rib-interspersed panes, also improved cockpit visibility.  Although the design had offered entirely greater capability, its late appearance at the end of the war had resulted in a short production run of only a few examples.

The B-24M had been the 6,725th and last of the basic configuration to have been produced by Consolidated Vultee in San Diego.

Nevertheless, the basic B-24 Liberator had more than proven its worth: by the time the last airframe had rolled off the production line on May 31, 1945, 18,479 aircraft of all versions had been built by Consolidated Vultee itself, Douglas, Ford, and North American, and had served the Army Air Corps, the Navy, and 15 Allied nations in every theater of war, having operated more missions and having dropped more bombs than any other single World War II design.

The aircraft intended for today’s flight, a B-24J, had been produced in August of 1944 by Consolidated Aircraft in Fort Worth, Texas, and had been delivered to the RAF two months later, in October, which had operated it in the Pacific in a multitude of roles, including bombing, anti-shipping, and resupplying resistance force operations, until the war had ended.

After listening to the pre-departure safety briefing on the ramp that September morning, the day’s seven passengers accessed the mighty, quad-engined bomber through its extended, under-fuselage bomb bay doors, balancing on one foot along the catwalk and climbing up toward the aft cabin, where three claimed the aft-facing, seatbelt-equipped bench ledge seats and the other three the lower floor positions.  The seventh had followed the catwalk forward to the radio operator’s station.

Momentarily belching black smoke as its four Pratt and Whitney R-1830 piston engines ignited into deep, throaty Hamilton Standard propeller rotations at 0900, the dark green-liveried Liberator, retracting its bomb bay doors and ventral hatch and testing its flight surfaces, released its brakes and advanced its throttles, inching over the American Airpower Museum ramp on to the taxiway upon clearance from Republic Ground on 121.6.  Paralleling the active runway, 32, and increasing ground speed, the mass of aluminum was buttressed by slipstream-produced winds entering its cabin through the opened waist gunner stations, the rudders continually deflected during its slow roll, as evidenced by the incessant pulley travels in the aft fuselage.  Taxiing, according to today’s copilot, had been difficult, despite the design’s B-17-improved tricycle undercarriage configuration, because of the gear’s relatively close-intervaled geometry, and the full-castering nose wheel caused a swinging tendency, creating the need for brake dependency and differential power applications. 

After a pause for a full run-up and flight surface deflections, the mammoth bomber, now trailed by its Flying Fortress counterpart, received take off clearance from Republic Tower on 125.2 and made the 180-degree right turn on to the threshold of the 6,827-foot runway, poised for initial transition from grounded, dead-weight, metallic tractor cushioned by rubber tires to airborne, majestic, wing-flexed bird cushioned by air.  Farmingdale, I thought, your World War II purposes are not over yet!  Advancing its four throttles and engulfed in a deafening cocoon of Twin Wasp noise emissions, the engines, gulping fuel like a thirst-deprived man in the desert, converted energy to propeller-scooping motion, sending fierce slipstream through the waist gunner stations and over the horizontal and vertical tail surfaces.  The man scrouched on the cabin’s left side proclaimed, “We’re rolling!” an expression I had heard countless times while watching acceleration rolls on the ground, but which somehow took on never-tiring, excitement-provoking meaning when coupled with the actual maneuver in the aircraft.

Maintaining 2,700-rpm and 41-inch manifold pressure settings on its engines, the behemoth moved through 90 mph, pulling back on its elevator-deflecting control yoke and, winning a metal machine-to-force of earth battle, surrendered itself to the sky in triumph with its straight, outstretched, suddenly graceful-appearing wings.  Retracting its drag-inducing, still-spinning undercarriage over Route 110, Witchcraft adhered to the airport’s nose abatement procedure, gently banking right on to a 010, almost northerly heading.  Throttling back to a 2,300-rpm and 31-inch manifold pressure setting, the B-24J, assuredly the envy of Republic’s multitude of daily departures and a giant in ratio to its almost toy-appearing general aviation singles, surmounted green-carpeted Long Island.  Through the starboard waist gunner’s window the monolithic high rises of Manhattan, although miniaturized from the current distance, could be seen.

Having rapidly accelerated to a 175-mph air speed, the bomber, further throttled into a 2,000-rpm and 30-inch manifold pressure setting, attained its cruise altitude of 1,500 feet over the velvet azure of Long Island Sound and its North Shore.  The four red-and-white candy-striped Northport Stacks passed below the right cockpit windows in miniature.  The aircraft banked to an easterly, 095-degree heading, maintaining the 2,000-rpm setting of its engines and the VFR 1200 frequency of its transponder.

The cruise mode induced a closer internal inspection.  The glazed, Plexiglas nose turret, projecting itself well ahead of the cockpit windows and location of the bombardier, had provided forward visibility and power-driven armament.  A below-floor crawl shaft led to the radio operator’s station, which featured a single, aft-facing, seat-belted floor position and a side-facing console with two small rectangular windows, directly below the roof turret and one step below the two-person canopied cockpit.  A foot-wide catwalk accessed the two bomb bays, which offered double the capacity of that of the comparable B-17.  Beyond had been the aft cabin with its ventral, extendible ball turret; two side-mounted tail turret ammunition storage racks; the two side-facing waist gunners’ stations; and, through the bulkhead, the fuselage-tapering tail turret which, located behind the empennage, provided a 180-degree, eye-level view of the constant deflections of the slipstream-bombarded horizontal stabilizers.  A crew of ten had standardly operated the B-24.

The wing tips, from the cockpit vantage point, had not been visible.  Skirting Long Island’s North Shore, the mammoth, metallic bomber moved toward Port Jefferson, its large passenger and vehicular ferry approaching the harbor under the right wing after another Long Island Sound crossing from Bridgeport, Connecticut.  Burning 637 gph of fuel at its take off power settings and a current 200 gph during cruise, it banked left out over the mirror blue surface of the water, its four engines fed by the wing-integral, foam-insulated kevlar fuel tanks whose total capacity had been reduced from the 2,300 gallons of the production version to the present 1,400 gallons.  Altitude could be maintained on any two powerplants.

The transition to the B-24, according to the copilot, had been difficult, particularly from the B-17, because of its flying characteristics.  Pitch-sensitive, the aircraft had a heavy elevator feel, although the ailerons provided a standard banking sensation.  Because of the fuselage area, it performed exemplary during side-slips, and its dual vertical fins and rudders were particularly effective.

Banking inland, Witchcraft recrossed the North Shore.  A reflection of the massive bomber tracked the ground, like a shadow.  Indeed, the aircraft itself had been a shadow of its once numerous brethren.  Sadly, it had been the only remaining operational one.

Maintaining a southerly heading, the Liberator radioed Republic tower its “inbound for landing” intention, passing to the right of the airport and extending its area-increasing Fowler flaps.  Arcing into a  right bank, to a 320-degree heading, it reintroduced its massive, oleo strut-attached tires into the slipstream and trimmed itself into a 120-mph approach speed.  Sinking toward the perimeter fence and passing over the runway’s threshold, it rotated into a still-airborne, power-reduced flare, its main wheels snatching concrete with a screech as they spooled up to the aircraft’s ground speed.

Taxiing on to the American Airpower Museum’s ramp and swinging round to the left, it absorbed the vibration through its wing spar as the fuel-starved propellers decelerated, the B-17 taxiing into position from its South Shore sortie behind it.  Appropriately, as in World War II, the B-24 Liberator had started second, but had finished first.

Once again climbing through the bomb bay doors to the ramp, I paused outside, marveling at the now-silent, motionless, though once-mighty bomber.  From the engineers who had designed it to the pilots who had flown it, the Consolidated Vultee B-24 Liberator had translated the technology of its design in to the triumph of its enemies.  I was proud to have experienced her.

About the Author

A graduate of Long Island University-C.W. Post Campus with a summa-cum-laude BA Degree in Comparative Languages and Journalism, I have subsequently earned the Continuing Community Education Teaching Certificate from the Nassau Association for Continuing Community Education (NACCE) at Molloy College, the Travel Career Development Certificate from the Institute of Certified Travel Agents (ICTA) at LIU, and the AAS Degree in Aerospace Technology at the State University of New York – College of Technology at Farmingdale. Having amassed almost three decades in the airline industry, I managed the New York-JFK and Washington-Dulles stations at Austrian Airlines, created the North American Station Training Program, served as an Aviation Advisor to Farmingdale State University of New York, and created and taught the Airline Management Certificate Program at the Long Island Educational Opportunity Center. A freelance author, I have written some 70 books of the short story, novel, nonfiction, essay, poetry, article, log, curriculum, training manual, and textbook genre in English, German, and Spanish, having principally focused on aviation and travel, and I have been published in book, magazine, newsletter, and electronic Web site form. I am a writer for Cole Palen’s Old Rhinebeck Aerodrome in New York.

High quality replacement in the field of window company in Indianapolis?

I'm looking for a company quality window that provides a quality similar to that of Pella and Andersen, but not so expensive. I have 20 casement windows, two openings each approximately 40 "wide by 50" tall. What I expect to pay for the replacement complete?

I think it is better contact several companies supply and demand to ask for references. You can make a more informed decision with more information. ~